|
Introduction
This course will trace the development of East Asian thought
through an examination of some of the most influential thinkers in
Chinese and Japanese history. Issues that will be covered include
East Asian perspectives on the “self” and “human nature,” the
relationship between humans and the cosmos, and the influence that
these ideas have had on East Asian conceptions of the socio-political
order. Although a variety of different perspectives will be
explored, the course will focus on the evolution of the three major
“schools” of East Asian thought—Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism—with
particular emphasis on the dialogical process of mutual influence that
defines the East Asian intellectual tradition as a whole. More
fundamentally, however, this course will provide an opportunity to
reflect on a variety of philosophical issues that are as relevant to
global citizens of the 21st century as they were to East Asians of the
past.
Grades
The breakdown of grades for the course is as follows:
10%
10%
15%
15%
10%
40%
|
Class Participation
Blackboard Participation
Mencius/Xunzi Debate (3-4 pages; due on September 29)
Midterm Paper (3-4 pages; due on October 15)
Topic Paragraph/Annotated Bibliography (due on November 5)
Final Paper (12-15 pages; due on November 21)
|
You final grade will ultimately depend on my assessment of your
performance in each of the above areas, though the following
descriptions should provide you with a rough idea of the defining
characteristics of students within
particular grade ranges:
A-/A Possesses a deep understanding of the major
concepts and themes of the course. The “A” student is able to
consistently
identify and explain key ideas in the primary sources, develop genuine
insights
into the broader significance of these texts, and demonstrate a high
level
of intellectual engagement in class discussions.
B-/B/B+ Demonstrates a serious commitment to the
course (i.e. attendance and participation) and a strong grasp of the
major concepts and themes but with less depth and/or consistency than
the “A” student.
C-/C/C+ Demonstrates a reasonable effort to attend
class and participate in discussions as well as a basic grasp of the
course material.
D Demonstrates a minimal commitment to the course
and
a weak grasp of basic concepts and themes.
F Fails to demonstrate an acceptable degree of
effort
in the course through low attendance, inability to discuss basic
concepts
and themes, missed assignments and/or plagiarized work.
Class/Blackboard Participation
Given the
complexity of many of the ideas that we’ll be studying, I believe that
discussion, both in class and on the web, will be extremely helpful for your
understanding of the material. Your
Class Participation mark (worth 10% of the final grade) will be based on your
ability to demonstrate that you have made a sincere attempt to read and
understand the assigned material; although the quality of your comments will
obviously be taken into consideration, please note that all attempts to
seriously engage the readings—from sharing your perspective on the material to
simply asking a relevant question—will enhance your grade. Your Blackboard Participation mark (also
worth 10% of the final grade) will similarly be based on the quantity and
quality of your comments on the readings, though in this case you will be
expected to post a minimum of ten reflections on the readings, one for each week in the term. To count towards the
minimum of ten Blackboard reflections you must post your comments before
the class for which the readings in question have been assigned; however, all
of your Blackboard postings—including responses to other students’ comments
(whether before or after the class in question)—will ultimately count towards
your Blackboard Participation grade. To
post a comment on Blackboard, simply click the “Blackboard” link on the course home
page and then log in with your North Central username and password (which is
set to your student ID# by default); then go to “East Asian Thought” and click
“Discussion Board”; you can then choose the reading that you want to comment on
by clicking the appropriate topic, which will correspond to a topic from the
course syllabus.
Mencius/Xunzi Debate
After
exploring the thought of Confucius and his two most important early followers,
Mencius and Xunzi, we will have an in-class debate on the question of whether
human nature is inherently good or bad. In preparation for the debate, you will be required to write a 3-4 page (750-1000
word) paper explaining both positions (which should be illustrated through
direct quotations), as well as your own perspective on the issue. Some of the questions you may wish to reflect
on as you write the paper include: how do Mencius and Xunzi define “human
nature” (M: 6A1-2, 6A6; X: 180-181); how do they account for “bad” behavior (M: 6A6, 6A8-9, 6A15; X: 179-180); how do they feel that
“goodness” should be cultivated (M: 6A14-15; X: 179-180, 182); and do they
value “humaneness” and “ritual” equally, or do either give priority to one over
the other (M: 6A16-19; X: 182-183). Your
response will be due in class on the day of the debate (M onday, September 29);
late submissions will not be accepted without an exceptional excuse. Your written response will be worth 15% of
the final grade, and although your participation in the class debate will not
be specifically graded (since there may not be enough time for everyone in the
class to speak), it will contribute to your final Class Participation mark.
Midterm Paper
The midterm paper is a 4-5 page essay (1000-1250
words, due on Wednesday, October 15) exploring the historical significance of a
passage from the assigned readings that was not discussed in class (though you may use material that was discussed in class to elucidate
the meaning of your chosen passage). Your paper should begin by quoting
the passage that you wish to focus on (or just the relevant parts if it is too long to cite in its
entirety). You should then provide an introduction in
which you state your “thesis” (i.e. the main point that you hope to demonstrate
in the body of the essay). Your exegesis of the passage should explain not only
the meaning of the text as it relates to the fundamental principles of the
tradition with which it is associated, but also how it contributes to that
tradition’s response to the sociopolitical chaos that arose from the collapse
of the Zhou feudal order during the Spring and Autumn (722-481 B.C.E.) and
Warring States (403-221 B.C.E.) periods. Your argument should be supported
through relevant quotes from both “primary”
sources (i.e. the original writings of authors from the period in
question) and at least two “secondary”
sources
(i.e. works that discuss various “primary” sources);
all references—both direct quotations and indirect references to
the ideas of another author—should be properly cited using the Chicago Style of citation. Finally, your
“conclusion” should explain how the argument you’ve presented has demonstrated
your thesis, as well as the overall significance of your exegesis.
Final Paper
The final paper
will be a 12-15 page essay (due on
Friday, November 21) on one of the main figures or traditions
studied during the term. Your paper
should include biographical and other contextual information about the thinker
or tradition in question, but it must also deal with the ideas of the thinker or
tradition, as well as the significance of these ideas within the broader history
of the East Asian intellectual tradition. In order to ensure that you are on the right path, you will be required
to submit a paragraph describing your topic together with an annotated
bibliography of the sources that you intend to use by Wednesday, November 5 (the
8th week of the course). The
annotated bibliography should include brief “annotations” describing and
evaluating the significance of each of the sources that you intend to use for
your paper. Since this is intended to be
a research paper, you must provide at
least five “print” sources in addition to
the assigned readings for the course; you may also use web-sources, though you
are discouraged from relying on them too heavily, as they often provide superficial,
biased and/or inaccurate information. Please note that you are required
to provide appropriate citations for both direct and indirect quotations using
“Chicago” style footnotes and bibliography (for more details click the
“Footnotes” link on the course home page). Since I take plagiarism very seriously, I strongly recommend that you
become familiar with the boundaries of academic honesty…and don’t attempt to
transgress them. If you have any doubts
regarding what does or does not constitute plagiarism, please refer to the
plagiarism link on my home page. Essays
that contain significant instances of plagiarism will receive a 0 and be
reported to the Office of Academic Affairs in accordance with college policy. Since this paper is worth 50% of your final
grade (40% for the paper plus 10% for the Topic Paragraph/Annotated
Bibliography), you should expect to devote a considerable amount of time to
this project; towards this end, I will
be happy to meet with you individually to provide further guidance at any stage
in the process.
Required Texts
● Jee Loo Liu, An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy [ITC]
● Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom (editors), Sources of Chinese Tradition, Vol. 1, 2nd Edition [SCT]
● An additional “Course Pack” of readings; to
purchase, follow the instructions at www.universityreaders.com/students/instructions.php.
Office Hours, Etc.
225 North Loomis Road, Room 23
Monday: 12-1
Tuesday: 4-5
Wednesday: 1-2
Thursday: 11-12
Friday (Tea/Talk): 4-5
Phone: 630-637-5619
E-mail: bhoffert@noctrl.edu
Home Page: http://brian.hoffert.faculty.noctrl.edu
|