|
I. The
Samkhya
System
The “orthodox” tradition gradually decreased its
emphasis on the practice of Vedic ritual, focusing instead on the
development of “orthodox” systems of philosophy and practice that drew
on the “unorthodox” traditions—most notably Jainism and Buddhism.
Two of the earliest, and most important,
are the philosophical system of Samkhya and its practical
application in
the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: |
.
Philosophically,
Samkhya and Yoga are almost identical.
Both view the world in terms of a fundamental duality: soul and
matter. In
Samkhya, these two principles are called purusa (“male”,
“person”)
and prakrti (“primordial matter”, sometimes translated as
“nature”). The number of souls is infinite, and each soul is eternally
distinct. When
a soul comes into contact with matter, its consciousness is
obscured. The
result is bondage and suffering. The way for the soul to escape
from suffering
is to realize its difference from nature. In Samkhya, this is
done by means
of discrimination; Yoga offers in addition various psycho-physical
techniques
as aids in the task of liberation and as means to attain extraordinary
powers. Yoga also (unlike the atheistic Samkhya) gives a limited role to Isvara
or God in the attainment of liberation. [IR, 132]
.
.
| …[Both] the manifest and unmanifest are
[characterized by the] three gunas (“qualities” or
“strands”)….The gunas, whose natures are pleasure, pain and
indifference {or “purity/goodness”
(sattva), “passion”
(rajas), and “darkness/inertia”
(tamas)} [serve to] manifest,
activate and limit. They successively dominate, support,
activate, and interact
with one another….Because of the proximity [or association] of the
two—i.e., prakrti and purusa—the unconscious one {i.e.
prakrti} appears as if
characterized by consciousness. Similarly, the indifferent one
{i.e. purusa} appears as
if characterized by activity, because of the activities of the three gunas.
The proximity [or association] of the two, which is like that of a
blind man
and a lame man, is for the purpose of seeing the pradhana {fundamental
substance} and for the purpose of the isolation of the purusa from
this [association] creation proceeds….This creation, brought about by prakrti—from
the great one (mahat) down to the specific gross
elements—[functions] for the sake of the release of each purusa;
[this is done] for the sake of another, as if it were for her own
[benefit]….[She] (prakrti), possessed of the gunas and
helpful in various ways, behaves selflessly for the sake of him [purusa],
who is without the gunas and who
plays no helpful part….Nothing, therefore, is bound; nothing released,
likewise
not any thing transmigrates. [Only] prakrti in its
various forms transmigrates,
is bound and is released….Thus, from the study [or analysis] of the
principles
(tattvas), the “knowledge” [or salvation-knowledge] arises, “I
am
not, nothing belongs to me, I do not exist”….Then, the purusa,
comfortably
situated like a spectator, sees prakrti whose activity has
ceased
due to the completion of her purpose, and who has turned back from the
seven
forms (rupa or bhava)….With the cessation of prakrti
due to its purpose having been accomplished, [the purusa]
on attaining separation from the body, attains isolation (kaivalya)
which is both certain and final. [IR, 134-6] |
.
|
.
II.
The Yoga of Patanjali
c. 1st-3rd Centuries CE
.
The Moral
Foundation
Controlling Emotions/Desires
1. Yama (moral
principles): “The moral principles are nonviolence (ahimsa),
truthfulness, abjuration of stealing, celibacy, and absence of greed”
[IR, 140]
2. Niyama (observances):
“The observances are bodily purification, contentment,
ascetic practice, study of sacred lore, and dedication to the Lord of
Yoga” [IR, 140]
- A movement from control over external conduct
towards a purification of one’s internal states, providing the moral foundation necessary to
remove the disturbances caused by emotions and desires.

Bodily
Discipline
Suppressing Physical Distractions
3. Asana (posture):
“steady and easy” [IR, 140]
4. Pranayama (breath
control): “breath is controlled by the regulation of the course of
inhalation and exhalation” [IR, 140]
5. Pratyahara (withdrawal
of the senses): “When each sense
organ severs contact with its objects, withdrawal of the senses
corresponds
to the intrinsic form of thought.” [IR, 140]
- Together, posture, breathing and
sense-withdrawal represent the stilling of the body, which is likened
to a tortoise pulling its limbs and head into its shell in order to
eliminate disturbances from the external world.
Samyama
Establishing Control of the Mind
6. Dharana (concentration):
“binding thought in one place”
[IR, 140]
7. Dhyana (meditation):
“focusing on a single conceptual flow” [IR, 140]
8. Samadhi (pure
contemplation/absorbtion): “meditation that illumines the object
alone, as if the subject were devoid of intrinsic form” [IR, 141]
- “In the final
level of samadhi, the object
of consciousness is suppressed and all influence of Prakriti is
removed. This is the state of samadhi
‘without seed,’
pure consciousness devoid of any object of consciousness, in which the
self is isolated from even the most subtle mental forms of
Prakriti. The self, freed to itself, exists in perfect
self-consciousness.”
[HRT, 68]
|
III. Theistic Developments
The Svetasvatara Upanishad
The goal of the
early Upanishads was to become one with the highest Brahman, the
Absolute beyond name and form. The highest knowledge was
knowledge of the impersonal nirguna
Brahman, Brahman “without qualities,” and it was
only this knowledge that brought release. The late Upanishads,
however, reflecting the increased importance of popular gods, show much
greater interest in the personal aspect of Brahman. This interest
was expressed in the form of a new theism that merged the cosmic
importance of the older Upanishadic Brahman-atman with the appeal of personal
gods. [HRT, 69]
The characteristics of
Upanishadic theism in its formative stage can probably best be examined
in the Svetasvatara Upanishad,
where also are found some of the earliest statements on yoga. The
Svetasvatara is
concerned with release from samsara
as were the older Upanishads, but its approach to release is openly
theistic: salvation comes not from knowledge of the impersonal
Brahman, but from knowledge of the personal Lord identified as Rudra or
Siva. Rudra-Siva is not just a
god, one among many; he is the God, the personal manifestation
of Brahman as ruler of the world and of the self. [HRT, 70]
Knowledge of the Lord comes through meditation (dhyana). Here the Svetasvatara makes a significant
shift in the Upanishadic concept of knowledge. Saving knowledge
is not knowledge of the impersonal Brahman but of the personal Lord,
and it is gained by coming to know Him as resident within one’s
self. This is explained by means of an analogy: the form (murti) of fire is present in wood,
even though it is not seen; it becomes visible when the friction of the
drill used to make fire brings it forth. So meditation on the
sound syllable om, the seed
mantra of the Lord, brings forth the vision of the Lord hidden in the
self...
.

|
[I]n the Chandogya Upanishad...one sound, the syllable om or aum, is said to stand for all sounds and thus for the entire
universe. [HRT, 72] |
|
.
...Once the murti
of the Lord is known within the self, the ignorance that kept the self
in bondage is broken. No longer does he seek enjoyment of Nature
out of weakness, for he knows that the Lord who rules Nature is present
in his own self. Directing his thoughts and feelings to this
all-powerful and unchanging Lord, uniting with Him through constant
meditation, he loses attachment to the world. [HRT, 70-71]
|
.
IV.
Varnasrama-Dharma
Duties (dharma) Associated with
Caste (varna) and Stage of Life (asrama)
|
Varna-Dharma
Duties Associated with the Four Castes
The Dharma Sastras
agreed with the Upanishads that the final goal of life was release from
samsara, but beyond this common point the emphasis
was quite different. The Upanishads and the later jnana traditions
[such as the system of Samkhya] put primary emphasis on knowledge of
Brahman and the self. Ritual and social duties were recognized
but given little attention, since the seeker after final knowledge had
presumably gone beyond such worldly concerns. Dharma
texts, on the other hand, noted only in a perfunctory way the final
goal of Brahman knowledge….The dharma texts concentrated
instead on the particulars of social duty. The basic focus was
not the goal beyond society but the arrangement of life within the
social system. [HRT, 74-5]
 |
Teaching, studying,
performing sacrificial rites, so too making others perform sacrificial
rites,
and giving away and receiving gifts—these he assigned to the brahmans. |
| Protection of the
people, giving away of wealth, performance of sacrificial rites, study,
and nonattachment to sensual pleasures—these are, in short, the duties
of a kshatriya. |
 |
 |
Tending of cattle,
giving away of wealth, performance of sacrificial rites, study, trade
and commerce, usury, and agriculture—these are the occupations of a vaishya. |
| The Lord has
prescribed only one occupation for a shudra, namely, service without
malice of even these
other three classes. [Fisher and Bailey, An Anthology of Living Religions, 70-1; cf. HRT, 76] |
 |
|
.
.
|
Asrama-Dharma
Duties Associated with the Stages of Life
.
Bramacarin
(student): dvijas (the
“twice-born”—i.e.
Brahmans, Ksatriyas and Vaisyas) enter the stage of the student at the
age
of 8/11/12, undergoing an initiation ceremony, called the upanayana,
in which they are given a “sacred thread” symbolizing their initiation
into
the Vedic tradition.
.
Grihastha
(householder): “Though Brahmanical studentship
and the final asramas of hermit and wandering ascetic were
characterized by celibacy and self restraint, lay life was not
downgraded because of this….Every Brahman was said to be born with a
triple indebtedness: to the sages, to the
gods, and to his ancestors. He became free of these only when he
had satisfied
the sages with celibacy, the gods with sacrifices, and his ancestors
with
a son. The first of these debts was discharged by dwelling with a
teacher as a brahmacarin, but the offering of sacrifices mainly
and the raising of sons uniquely were the duties of householders.”
[HRT, 77-8]
.
Vanaprastha
(forest dweller): “…householder life is the most
important of the asramas because it alone leads to the production of
offspring and the support of society, but…when this stage is completed
those who are qualified should go on to seek release.” [HRT, 82]
.
.
Sannyasa
(renouncer): “Unlike the vanaprasta stage,
sannyasinhood was entered by means of a formal ritual in which the
initiate renounced all worldly ties including all relationships with
wife and family: “No one belongs to me and I belong to no
one.” This was done with the performance of his last
fire sacrifice in which he gave up finally his sacrificial vessels and
his
sacred fires, deposited the fires mentally within himself, and
henceforth was bound no longer to home or household rituals. He
affirmed vows of noninjury to any creature, truthfulness, unconcern for
property or wealth, and total continence, declaring formally his
renunciation of the world and entry into a state of sannyasa,
“abandonment.” The ceremony was concluded by offering the gods
his “sacred thread,” the symbol of Vedic initiation and the beginning
of “twice-born” life, and taking a new name to replace his old family
identity. Wearing only sandals, loincloth, and an ochre-colored
upper garment, and taking
with him only a staff, a water jar, and a begging bowl, he should from
this
point on live alone and not seek the company of others. His life
should be
characterized by restraint of speech (observance of silence), restraint
of
action (noninjury to any creature), and restraint of mind (performance
of
breath control, meditation, and other yogic practices); by these he
would gradually purify himself, attain desirelessness (vairagya),
and achieve
knowledge of self and Brahman that would bring final release from the
transitoriness of samsara. [HRT, 83]
.
|
Women & Varnasrama-dharma
 |
The Life of Hinduism
Marriage

Munni had heard older girls whispering about mahina,
something that happened to a woman every month. She had an idea what it
was, but still she was not prepared for its happening to her. One day
she found a spot on her clothes. She knew it was something embarrassing
and tried to hide it, but her cousin’s wife noticed it and took
her aside. Bhabhi explained to Munni what mahina was
and told her how to deal with it....Bhabhi also told Munni never to
touch a man or even a woman during her period. She should sit apart
from others and not go to religious or social events, because a
menstruating woman is considered “dirty” until she takes a
full bath five days after the start of her period. After her bath, she
can again enter the kitchen, draw water, and resume normal interaction
with others. [The Life of Hinduism (LOH), 63]
Unknown to Munni, her parents had already
begun making inquiries about her marriage several years before she
reached puberty, and they had hoped to have the wedding before the girl
“began bathing.” A generation ago, parents who had an
unmarried pubescent girl in the house would have been severely
criticized, but today villagers are more tolerant of marriages after
puberty. Still, the average age of marriage for village girls in the
Bhopal area is about eleven, and brides of seven or eight are not
unknown in Central India. In 1995 the government of India enacted a law
providing legal penalties for those responsible for the marriage of a
girl younger than fifteen or a boy younger than eighteen, but this law
is widely ignored. Most villagers are ignorant of its existence, and
since village marriages are not registered with any government
authority, “child marriage” occurs with great regularity
throughout the northern half of India. [LOH, 64]
An unarranged “love marriage” is
considered by most Indians to be a daring and perhaps ill-fated
alternative to an ordinary arranged marriage. Many urban youths who
have studied and dated abroad return home to wed mates selected for
them by their parents....Intercaste marriages (seldom arranged) occur
now with increasing frequency, particularly in cities, but they are
still disapproved by the vast majority of Indians. Only in the most
Westernized circles, among less than 1 percent of the population, do
young couples date and freely choose their own mates. [LOH, 66]
During past centuries, very high castes
prohibited widow remarriage, and a widow was sometimes expected to
immolate herself on her husband’s funeral pyre. This practice,
known as sati, occurred in only a very small percentage of families and was legally abolished over a century ago....Today, reports of satis appear in North Indian newspapers once or twice a year. [LOH, 71]

Widows
The common
blessing for a woman, ‘May your husband
live long’ is self explanatory. Although the strict code of
conduct prescribed
for widows is no longer operative in its most restrictive and
oppressive
aspects, there are certain disabilities associated with
widowhood. She is
debarred from active participation in auspicious occasions.
Besides the items
of decoration associated with the married state, she is expected to
discard
colourful clothes, glass bangles, wearing of flowers, and attractive
jewelery.
Plain white colour is associated with widowhood, and by implication is
forbidden
traditionally for Sumangali, i.e., one whose husband is alive.
The widows
of Bengal, who abstain from fish, the Kammas and Reddy widows of Andhra
Pradesh
who give up meat are not yet extinct. Among the Brahmin and also
among such
non-Brahmin communities who do not have the custom of widow remarriage,
there
are a number of ways for restricting the life of a widow so that she
gets
little pleasure out of life and her natural desires are suppressed.
[Willard G. Oxtoby, World Religions:
Eastern
Traditions [WR],
111]
.
Oesterle Library: VIDEO 791.43 W29m
|
.

Munni spent three more years in the bosom of
her family, happily taking part in household and agricultural work and
enjoying the frequent festivals observed in the village....Munni knew
that her idyll among her natal kin would not last much longer. Many of
her friends had already been sent to their husbands’ homes, and
Munni too would soon go. Her gauna (consumation ceremony) was set for March. The night before her gauna, Munni’s bhabhi
took her aside and told her about sex and what to expect from her
husband....Her departure from her parents, grandmother, brothers,
sisters, uncles, aunts and cousins was heartrending. Cling to each in
turn, she sobbed piteously and pleaded not to be sent away. They, too,
cried as they put her in a small, covered palanquin and saw her borne
away by her in-laws....Modesty required that she try to fend him off
and succumb only after great protestation (even an experienced girl
must feign modesty), but Munni was sixteen at her gauna
ceremony, and her introduction to her husband was not traumatic. Some
younger girls have been genuinely terrified of their husbands, and
their gauna nights have involved virtual rape. [LOH, 71-3]
|
Though destitute of virtue, or seeking
pleasure
elsewhere, or devoid of good qualities, a husband must be constantly
worshipped
as a god by a faithful wife. [WR, 107]
By a girl, by a young woman or even by an
aged one,
nothing must be done independently, even in her own house. In
childhood
a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her husband, when
her
lord is dead, to her sons; a woman must never be independent. [WR,
107]
Where women are honoured, there the gods are
pleased;
but where they are not honoured, no sacred rite yields rewards.
Where the
female relations live in grief, the family soon perishes; but that
family
where they are not unhappy ever prospers. The houses on which
female relations,
not being duly honoured, pronounce a curse, perish completely, as if
destroyed
by magic. [WR, 108-9]
|
.
|
|