“Orthodox” Responses to the
“Unorthodox” Traditions

.

I. The Samkhya System
The “orthodox” tradition gradually decreased its emphasis on the practice of Vedic ritual, focusing instead on the development of “orthodox” systems of philosophy and practice that drew on the “unorthodox” traditions—most notably Jainism and Buddhism. Two of the earliest, and most important, are the philosophical system of Samkhya and its practical application in the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali:
.
Philosophically, Samkhya and Yoga are almost identical.  Both view the world in terms of a fundamental duality: soul and matter. In Samkhya, these two principles are called purusa (“male”, “person”) and prakrti (“primordial matter”, sometimes translated as “nature”). The number of souls is infinite, and each soul is eternally distinct. When a soul comes into contact with matter, its consciousness is obscured. The result is bondage and suffering. The way for the soul to escape from suffering is to realize its difference from nature. In Samkhya, this is done by means of discrimination; Yoga offers in addition various psycho-physical techniques as aids in the task of liberation and as means to attain extraordinary powers. Yoga also (unlike the atheistic Samkhya) gives a limited role to Isvara or God in the attainment of liberation. [IR, 132]
.
.
…[Both] the manifest and unmanifest are [characterized by the] three gunas (“qualities” or “strands”)….The gunas, whose natures are pleasure, pain and indifference {or “purity/goodness (sattva), passion (rajas), and darkness/inertia (tamas)} [serve to] manifest, activate and limit.  They successively dominate, support, activate, and interact with one another….Because of the proximity [or association] of the two—i.e., prakrti and purusa—the unconscious one {i.e. prakrti} appears as if characterized by consciousness.  Similarly, the indifferent one {i.e. purusa} appears as if characterized by activity, because of the activities of the three gunas.  The proximity [or association] of the two, which is like that of a blind man and a lame man, is for the purpose of seeing the pradhana {fundamental substance} and for the purpose of the isolation of the purusa from this [association] creation proceeds….This creation, brought about by prakrti—from the great one (mahat) down to the specific gross elements—[functions] for the sake of the release of each purusa; [this is done] for the sake of another, as if it were for her own [benefit]….[She] (prakrti), possessed of the gunas and helpful in various ways, behaves selflessly for the sake of him [purusa], who is without the gunas and who plays no helpful part….Nothing, therefore, is bound; nothing released, likewise not any thing transmigrates.  [Only] prakrti in its various forms transmigrates, is bound and is released….Thus, from the study [or analysis] of the principles (tattvas), the “knowledge” [or salvation-knowledge] arises, “I am not, nothing belongs to me, I do not exist”….Then, the purusa, comfortably situated like a spectator, sees prakrti whose activity has ceased due to the completion of her purpose, and who has turned back from the seven forms (rupa or bhava)….With the cessation of prakrti due to its purpose having been accomplished, [the purusa] on attaining separation from the body, attains isolation (kaivalya) which is both certain and final. [IR, 134-6]
.
.

II. The Yoga of Patanjali
c. 1st-3rd Centuries CE
.

The Moral Foundation
Controlling Emotions/Desires

1. Yama (moral principles): “The moral principles are nonviolence (ahimsa), truthfulness, abjuration of stealing, celibacy, and absence of greed” [IR, 140]
2. Niyama (observances): “The observances are bodily purification, contentment, ascetic practice, study of sacred lore, and dedication to the Lord of Yoga” [IR, 140]

  • A movement from control over external conduct towards a purification of one’s internal states, providing the moral foundation necessary to remove the disturbances caused by emotions and desires.


Bodily Discipline
Suppressing Physical Distractions

3. Asana (posture): “steady and easy” [IR, 140]
4. Pranayama (breath control): “breath is controlled by the regulation of the course of inhalation and exhalation” [IR, 140]
5. Pratyahara (withdrawal of the senses): “When each sense organ severs contact with its objects, withdrawal of the senses corresponds to the intrinsic form of thought.” [IR, 140]

  • Together, posture, breathing and sense-withdrawal represent the stilling of the body, which is likened to a tortoise pulling its limbs and head into its shell in order to eliminate disturbances from the external world.

Samyama
Establishing Control of the Mind

6. Dharana (concentration): “binding thought in one place” [IR, 140]
7. Dhyana (meditation): “focusing on a single conceptual flow” [IR, 140]
8. Samadhi (pure contemplation/absorbtion): “meditation that illumines the object alone, as if the subject were devoid of intrinsic form” [IR, 141]

  • In the final level of samadhi, the object of consciousness is suppressed and all influence of Prakriti is removed. This is the state of samadhi ‘without seed, pure consciousness devoid of any object of consciousness, in which the self is isolated from even the most subtle mental forms of Prakriti. The self, freed to itself, exists in perfect self-consciousness. [HRT, 68]

III. Theistic Developments
The Svetasvatara Upanishad

The goal of the early Upanishads was to become one with the highest Brahman, the Absolute beyond name and form. The highest knowledge was knowledge of the impersonal nirguna Brahman, Brahman “without qualities,” and it was only this knowledge that brought release. The late Upanishads, however, reflecting the increased importance of popular gods, show much greater interest in the personal aspect of Brahman. This interest was expressed in the form of a new theism that merged the cosmic importance of the older Upanishadic Brahman-atman with the appeal of personal gods. [HRT, 69]

The characteristics of Upanishadic theism in its formative stage can probably best be examined in the Svetasvatara Upanishad, where also are found some of the earliest statements on yoga. The Svetasvatara is concerned with release from samsara as were the older Upanishads, but its approach to release is openly theistic: salvation comes not from knowledge of the impersonal Brahman, but from knowledge of the personal Lord identified as Rudra or Siva. Rudra-Siva is not just a god, one among many; he is the God, the personal manifestation of Brahman as ruler of the world and of the self. [HRT, 70]

Knowledge of the Lord comes through meditation (dhyana). Here the Svetasvatara makes a significant shift in the Upanishadic concept of knowledge. Saving knowledge is not knowledge of the impersonal Brahman but of the personal Lord, and it is gained by coming to know Him as resident within one’s self. This is explained by means of an analogy: the form (murti) of fire is present in wood, even though it is not seen; it becomes visible when the friction of the drill used to make fire brings it forth. So meditation on the sound syllable om, the seed mantra of the Lord, brings forth the vision of the Lord hidden in the self...
.

[I]n the Chandogya Upanishad...one sound, the syllable om or aum, is said to stand for all sounds and thus for the entire universe. [HRT, 72]
.
...Once the murti of the Lord is known within the self, the ignorance that kept the self in bondage is broken.  No longer does he seek enjoyment of Nature out of weakness, for he knows that the Lord who rules Nature is present in his own self.  Directing his thoughts and feelings to this all-powerful and unchanging Lord, uniting with Him through constant meditation, he loses attachment to the world. [HRT, 70-71]
.
IV. Varnasrama-Dharma
Duties (dharma) Associated with
Caste (varna)
and Stage of Life (asrama)
Varna-Dharma
Duties Associated with the Four Castes
The Dharma Sastras agreed with the Upanishads that the final goal of life was release from samsara, but beyond this common point the emphasis was quite different. The Upanishads and the later jnana traditions [such as the system of Samkhya] put primary emphasis on knowledge of Brahman and the self. Ritual and social duties were recognized but given little attention, since the seeker after final knowledge had presumably gone beyond such worldly concerns. Dharma texts, on the other hand, noted only in a perfunctory way the final goal of Brahman knowledge….The dharma texts concentrated instead on the particulars of social duty. The basic focus was not the goal beyond society but the arrangement of life within the social system. [HRT, 74-5]
Teaching, studying, performing sacrificial rites, so too making others perform sacrificial rites, and giving away and receiving gifts—these he assigned to the brahmans.
Protection of the people, giving away of wealth, performance of sacrificial rites, study, and nonattachment to sensual pleasures—these are, in short, the duties of a kshatriya.
Tending of cattle, giving away of wealth, performance of sacrificial rites, study, trade and commerce, usury, and agriculture—these are the occupations of a vaishya.
The Lord has prescribed only one occupation for a shudra, namely, service without malice of even these other three classes. [Fisher  and Bailey, An Anthology of Living Religions, 70-1; cf. HRT, 76]
.
.
Asrama-Dharma
Duties Associated with the Stages of Life

.
.
Bramacarin (student): dvijas (the “twice-born”—i.e. Brahmans, Ksatriyas and Vaisyas) enter the stage of the student at the age of 8/11/12, undergoing an initiation ceremony, called the upanayana, in which they are given a “sacred thread” symbolizing their initiation into the Vedic tradition.
.
.
Grihastha (householder): “Though Brahmanical studentship and the final asramas of hermit and wandering ascetic were characterized by celibacy and self restraint, lay life was not downgraded because of this….Every Brahman was said to be born with a triple indebtedness:  to the sages, to the gods, and to his ancestors. He became free of these only when he had satisfied the sages with celibacy, the gods with sacrifices, and his ancestors with a son. The first of these debts was discharged by dwelling with a teacher as a brahmacarin, but the offering of sacrifices mainly and the raising of sons uniquely were the duties of householders.” [HRT, 77-8]
.
.
Vanaprastha (forest dweller): “…householder life is the most important of the asramas because it alone leads to the production of offspring and the support of society, but…when this stage is completed those who are qualified should go on to seek release.” [HRT, 82]
.
.
Sannyasa (renouncer): “Unlike the vanaprasta stage, sannyasinhood was entered by means of a formal ritual in which the initiate renounced all worldly ties including all relationships with wife and family: “No one belongs to me and I belong to no one.” This was done with the performance of his last fire sacrifice in which he gave up finally his sacrificial vessels and his sacred fires, deposited the fires mentally within himself, and henceforth was bound no longer to home or household rituals. He affirmed vows of noninjury to any creature, truthfulness, unconcern for property or wealth, and total continence, declaring formally his renunciation of the world and entry into a state of sannyasa, “abandonment.”  The ceremony was concluded by offering the gods his “sacred thread,” the symbol of Vedic initiation and the beginning of “twice-born” life, and taking a new name to replace his old family identity. Wearing only sandals, loincloth, and an ochre-colored upper garment, and taking with him only a staff, a water jar, and a begging bowl, he should from this point on live alone and not seek the company of others. His life should be characterized by restraint of speech (observance of silence), restraint of action (noninjury to any creature), and restraint of mind (performance of breath control, meditation, and other yogic practices); by these he would gradually purify himself, attain desirelessness (vairagya), and achieve knowledge of self and Brahman that would bring final release from the transitoriness of samsara. [HRT, 83]
.
.

Women & Varnasrama-dharma


The Life of Hinduism
Marriage

Munni had heard older girls whispering about mahina, something that happened to a woman every month. She had an idea what it was, but still she was not prepared for its happening to her. One day she found a spot on her clothes. She knew it was something embarrassing and tried to hide it, but her cousin’s wife noticed it and took her aside. Bhabhi explained to Munni what mahina was and told her how to deal with it....Bhabhi also told Munni never to touch a man or even a woman during her period. She should sit apart from others and not go to religious or social events, because a menstruating woman is considered “dirty” until she takes a full bath five days after the start of her period. After her bath, she can again enter the kitchen, draw water, and resume normal interaction with others. [The Life of Hinduism (LOH), 63]


Unknown to Munni, her parents had already begun making inquiries about her marriage several years before she reached puberty, and they had hoped to have the wedding before the girl “began bathing.” A generation ago, parents who had an unmarried pubescent girl in the house would have been severely criticized, but today villagers are more tolerant of marriages after puberty. Still, the average age of marriage for village girls in the Bhopal area is about eleven, and brides of seven or eight are not unknown in Central India. In 1995 the government of India enacted a law providing legal penalties for those responsible for the marriage of a girl younger than fifteen or a boy younger than eighteen, but this law is widely ignored. Most villagers are ignorant of its existence, and since village marriages are not registered with any government authority, “child marriage” occurs with great regularity throughout the northern half of India. [LOH, 64]


An unarranged “love marriage” is considered by most Indians to be a daring and perhaps ill-fated alternative to an ordinary arranged marriage. Many urban youths who have studied and dated abroad return home to wed mates selected for them by their parents....Intercaste marriages (seldom arranged) occur now with increasing frequency, particularly in cities, but they are still disapproved by the vast majority of Indians. Only in the most Westernized circles, among less than 1 percent of the population, do young couples date and freely choose their own mates. [LOH, 66]


During past centuries, very high castes prohibited widow remarriage, and a widow was sometimes expected to immolate herself on her husband’s funeral pyre. This practice, known as sati, occurred in only a very small percentage of families and was legally abolished over a century ago....Today, reports of satis appear in North Indian newspapers once or twice a year. [LOH, 71]


Widows
The common blessing for a woman, ‘May your husband live long’ is self explanatory.  Although the strict code of conduct prescribed for widows is no longer operative in its most restrictive and oppressive aspects, there are certain disabilities associated with widowhood.  She is debarred from active participation in auspicious occasions.  Besides the items of decoration associated with the married state, she is expected to discard colourful clothes, glass bangles, wearing of flowers, and attractive jewelery.  Plain white colour is associated with widowhood, and by implication is forbidden traditionally for Sumangali, i.e., one whose husband is alive.  The widows of Bengal, who abstain from fish, the Kammas and Reddy widows of Andhra Pradesh who give up meat are not yet extinct.  Among the Brahmin and also among such non-Brahmin communities who do not have the custom of widow remarriage, there are a number of ways for restricting the life of a widow so that she gets little pleasure out of life and her natural desires are suppressed. [Willard G. Oxtoby, World Religions: Eastern Traditions [WR], 111]
.

Oesterle Library: VIDEO 791.43 W29m
.

Munni spent three more years in the bosom of her family, happily taking part in household and agricultural work and enjoying the frequent festivals observed in the village....Munni knew that her idyll among her natal kin would not last much longer. Many of her friends had already been sent to their husbands’ homes, and Munni too would soon go. Her gauna (consumation ceremony) was set for March. The night before her gauna, Munni’s bhabhi took her aside and told her about sex and what to expect from her husband....Her departure from her parents, grandmother, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts and cousins was heartrending. Cling to each in turn, she sobbed piteously and pleaded not to be sent away. They, too, cried as they put her in a small, covered palanquin and saw her borne away by her in-laws....Modesty required that she try to fend him off and succumb only after great protestation (even an experienced girl must feign modesty), but Munni was sixteen at her gauna ceremony, and her introduction to her husband was not traumatic. Some younger girls have been genuinely terrified of their husbands, and their gauna nights have involved virtual rape. [LOH, 71-3]

Though destitute of virtue, or seeking pleasure elsewhere, or devoid of good qualities, a husband must be constantly worshipped as a god by a faithful wife. [WR, 107]

By a girl, by a young woman or even by an aged one, nothing must be done independently, even in her own house.  In childhood a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her husband, when her lord is dead, to her sons; a woman must never be independent. [WR, 107] 

Where women are honoured, there the gods are pleased; but where they are not honoured, no sacred rite yields rewards.  Where the female relations live in grief, the family soon perishes; but that family where they are not unhappy ever prospers.  The houses on which female relations, not being duly honoured, pronounce a curse, perish completely, as if destroyed by magic. [WR, 108-9]

.